Sunday, May 26, 2013

Trek Month Comes to a Close

As the unintended Trek month comes to a close here at DWT, I thought I would bring out an old piece of writing.

I wrote this poem for one of my college writing classes. Inspired by the movie Star Trek: Generations, it actually won an honorable mention in a national poetry contest. Enjoy!



ODE TO CAPTAIN KIRK
 
Captain Kirk, what a man.
Played as only Shatner can.
Traveling the universe in the Enterprise,
He was the apple of all the girls' eyes.
With Spock and Bones and the rest of the gang,
Sometimes even Uhura sang.
 
Then, one day, he entered the Nexxus,
Where he was taken away from us.
He died alone, as he knew he would,
Although Picard did all he could.
When you join Starfleet, sometimes death is a perk.
Long Live Captain James Tiberius Kirk!

"Spock Versus The Volcano"

That's the first thing I said to my friend Duncan when we saw one of the trailers for Star Trek: Into Darkness a couple of months ago. But the movie is so much more than that.

Star Trek: Into Darkness--or, STID in fan-speak--is JJ Abrams' second film in his re-launch of the iconic TV and film series. This time, Kirk and the gang must head off to the edge of the Neutral Zone--a kind of DMZ between Federation and Klingon territory--to bring back a fugitive from justice.

And the team has help with this: Khan Noonien Singh--yes, THAT Khan. Because of this, some people feel this movie is just a remake of  The Wrath Of Khan, the second film with the original cast. But Khan's role here is different. While he is a bad guy and his backstory is similar to the original Khan,  he helps Kirk find the runaway fugitive, a Federation operative trying to tear things apart from the inside. Watching the film, I thought of this Khan more like Hannibal Lecktor, the dangerous man you have locked up who is helping you solve the real mystery.

The film is full of enough comedy, drama, special effects, and action to keep both Trek and non-Trek fans interested. One very funny scene involves Kirk trying to diffuse a lover's spat between Uhura and Spock--as they are going into battle. There is the introduction of Carol Markus and a mention of Nurse Chapel. Oh, and Scotty quits.

Even those who are not Trek fans will enjoy the film. The special effects are the best. The action scenes are great and there is just enough exposition as to who the characters are that you don't have to have full knowledge going in.

The one quibble would be that the Klingons give up a little too easily. But ultimately, it doesn't matter.

As for that pesky volcano, well, it's a sight you really just have to see for yourself. You'll be glad you did.

I've heard that Abrams is planning to make just one more film. If number three is the last one--not just his last one--I sure hope it's as good as number two. Which itself is the rare sequel that is better than the first.

To sum up, I'll simply repeat what I told Duncan as we left the theatre: "New favorite movie--ever!"

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Movie Review: Trek Nation

Trek Nation
Documentary
Director: Scott Colthorpe
Roddenberry Entertainment for the Science Channel, 2010
Run Time: 1 hr 28 min

This film is a story of two stories. Hosted/narrated by Eugene Roddenberry, son of Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, it is first a history of Star Trek and Trek fandom. But it is also the story of a son searching for his father, through the vehicle of the father's greatest creation.

The elder Roddenberry died when Eugene was just 17 years old, so Eugene never really knew his father; this film is an effort to learn about him. In pursuit of this goal, Eugene uses interviews not just with family, friends, Star Trek cast, crew, and fans, but also Seth McFarland, George Lucas, and JJ Abrams (at the time, Abrams was in the process of filming his Star Trek reboot). These are intercut with footage from Star Trek conventions and Roddenberry home movies.

Sitting alone in a planetarium, Eugene tells us the early history of his father's life: World War II bomber pilot turned Pan Am pilot,  then cop and TV writer. When we arrive at the beginnings of Star Trek, the film really hits its stride.

Roddenberry starts his journey with an interview with his own mother, Majel Barrett-Roddenberry, who played Nurse Chapel in the Original Series. "She was not as open as I was hoping, " Eugene says in voice over. And the footage used in the film bears that out. She really doesn't say much, and, as she herself admits, doesn't have much to say. We can tell that she loved her husband, but we don't learn anything beyond that.

So, Roddenberry looks elsewhere. Two of the most interesting interviews are with George Lucas and Wil Wheaton.

Roddenberry drove  to the Skywalker Ranch for his talk with Lucas: "The father of Star Wars talking about the father of Star Trek", he says as the passes through the security gate, "this should be interesting." We learn that Lucas is a fan of Trek, but, as always, he has to plug Wars: "Star Wars is an action-based space opera. Your father created science fiction, but it's more than that: Star Trek is about the philosophy of the human condition." When asked about the whole Trek/Wars rivalry, Lucas says he doesn't get into that. " I can't imagine what would happen if the Millennium Falcon went up against the Enterprise".

In Roddenberry's conversation with Wil Wheaton, who played Wesley Crusher in Star Trek: The Next Generation, we hear a story that says alot about Eugene's father: "Your dad and I were at a convention together. I was just 14 years old. Gene was on stage taking a lot of flack about my character. The fans hated Wesley. He stood up there and told them, 'This is my character, he is exactly the way I want him to be. You don't like him, you can go watch something else.' That really meant alot to me." It is fairly well known that Wesley was the most autobiographical of all of the Star Trek characters, in fact Wesley was Gene's middle name, so you can see how he took it personally.

Eugene admits to a bit of jealousy at this, but in the end, he does accomplish his goal. He comes away with alot more knowledge and respect for his father. He understands who his father was, and what he did. On this point, the film gets an A. However, we don't really learn anything new about Trek that hasn't been seen in previous documentaries. While this wasn't the host's main reason for making the film, on this level it gets a C.